New and improved Sreesanth

IPL: Why did the Deccan Chargers fail?

The clear pre-tournament favourites for many was the most disappointing team in the tournament. A batting line-up filled with explosive stars like Gilchrist, Gibbs, Symonds and Afridi was supposedly the sure-fire hit for twenty-20 cricket, yet they failed miserably. To be fair, on another year, the same people like Afridi and Gibbs could well have taken apart every opposition to boring sports psychologists. But then, the catch with these guys has been the big tag called “inconsistency”.

Gibbs is not part of the South African team. Why? Dropped due to his recent lack of consistency and form.

Afridi… Can you associate this guy on dependability and consistency? With his bowling yes but certainly not by his batting.

Gilchrist… Though he has been their best player with many good knocks, there has also been his fair share of out and out failures. A look at his recent form while he was playing for Australia also shows signs of dwindling consistency. After all, didn’t he not go for an entire world cup with ordinary performances and then magically fired in the final with a great knock.

So their coaches/management should have considered the risks behind fielding their players, should have thought well in building a right base of local talent, which they have out and out ignored. Is there anyone from the local lads who had a decent run? Without a shadow of doubt they were the worst of the local talent compared to the other teams. The management simply did not invest enough on hunting the right people.

After all the teams who are there in the semi-finals are the ones who have paid attention to their local talent base and quite clearly these so called lesser knows were the toast to their success. Teams like the Kolkatta Knight riders who had a good local talent base but choose to ignore them took a very deserving stick.

But the biggest and the most disappointing aspect of the Deccan Chargers was their bowling. To be honest, it has been the single most valid reason for their failure not their batting. One look at the stats and you can see that their win ratio largely depended on their strike bowlers performances. The likes of R.P. Singh and Vaas looks washed out and flat and on a serious note on Vaas, he ought to hang his boots and give the lamp over to Maharoof.  RP may have once been among the contenders of the purple cap but quite honestly with the exception of maybe 2 matches, none of it was flattering for someone with a good international exposure.

It was nice to see Gilchrist keeping his faith in Vijaykumar and Ojha who both seem to have some ability. And the biggest mystery would be the faith in Sanjay Bangar for such an extended time, where each match was a disaster. I did not find Laxman’s captaincy inspiring and he often looked totally clueless. Rohit Sharma was the next best player after Gilchrist, whose slump towards the end took out the only working teeth in their batting attack.

Seriously thinking, this batting line-up could have taken the rest apart, maybe next year but the management has to have a very serious look at revamping and strengthening their bowling attack and spend significantly time and faith into understanding the abilities of their local talent and pick out the better ones.

Share this Post:
Digg Google Bookmarks StumbleUpon Technorati Yahoo! Buzz

14 Responses to “IPL: Why did the Deccan Chargers fail?”

  • Wasim says:

    On the bowling side they picked a single dimesional attack by picking up three lefties, Zyosa and Vaas are a spent force, and RP disappointed me,to compensate this in batting they selected too many mutidimensional players, Afridi, Symonds,Styris, rao.

    These days there is hardly a true all rounder in the world who can take care of both batting and bowling consistently, Afridi everybody knows he can’t bat anymore, Symonds failed with the ball bigtime,Styris I don’t know why he was hired in the first place, Rao batted well but his bowling was not that good.

    Bits and pieces players failed to execute their roles and in the absence of quality bowlers they failed to defend even decent totals.

    Laxmans personal form also didn’t help much.

    I think DC management must have now realized the difference between a slogger and a quality batsman,the definition of a T20 specialist batsman has been changed.

    Anybody can bat like Afridi, give them a Wham Bham licence and a little net practice even your tail enders will loft the ball for a few boundaries. The risk associated with such batting is always high and only those players who have wide range of shots will be more successful as it has been proved by Gambhir, Marsh, Sehwag, and Sharma.

    I think DC will trade a few of their players this year.

  • scorpicity says:

    Wasim… can teams start trading this year itself or is there some lock-in period?

  • the main problem with them was the commitment more than anything else…they could not commit themselves to become a unit and thats where they lacked…

    i don’t think there is any lock-in period…

  • Soulberry says:

    Fair points about batting, Scorpi. I guess that was overlooked and the initial presence of Symonds was expected to get DC off to a start. The bowling was known to be weak right from selection time.

    DC need to rework their team. This one’s not going very far.

    RP flattened out long ago…since the T20 WC. He has been declining since.

  • Wasim says:

    All I Know the trades can be done at the end of this years IPL tournament, which I think is wrong,teams should be allowed to trade after Q2 within a trading deadline.

  • Som says:

    Deccan bowling lacked teeth and sting. I think nobody expected such a power-packed batting line-up to misfire and that too in unison! Afridi can be a two-edged sword and chances are you would end up bleeding yourself. I think Styris did a decent job and it was often his cameos which would swell the Deccan tally. Overall, the team did not look that bad but eventually they went down under-achievers.

  • scorpicity says:

    SP.. you reckon the guys there were for the money only?

  • scorpicity says:

    Soulberry.. also the captaincy from Laxman was really flat which cost them especially in terms of the choice of bowlers towards the death overs… they lost a couple of games due to that.

  • scorpicity says:

    Wasim… fair point I agree with you… there should be at least 2 years for the trade offs… though I must say they ought to do something about the choice of local talent picked.

  • scorpicity says:

    True som… on any other given time, they might well be the team on top in terms of their batting… but I must say I have been disappointed with styris esp with his bowling.

  • afridi n gibbs didn’t even fire in the nets.
    too many similar all go for the jugular batsmen; but dracula they were not – how can you open with gibbs n gilli (it’s tough on the com box too). leadership sucked, but followers sucked too.
    afridi should’ve captained.

  • scorpicity says:

    NC… specifically their leadership just wasn’t right… wrong moves at the wrong time all misfired back at them.

  • Avnish says:

    Good Point Dude

    But I have always maintained that the Chargers always had 4 foreigners,RP Singh, Rohit Sharma and Laxman as the players in the side. Rest were making up the numbers.

    This side also suffered coz all the decent players in the Ranji side were taken by the ICL. Like in the game against RCB they were always a batsman and a bowler short. In this format that can be expensive.

    As for RP Singh, he recently said that he wud have been more happy had his great performance in the IPL brought more wins for his side.Does he really think he has been great. Five of the top 40 most expensive figures in the tournament.And how many early breakthroughs? They probabaly expected him to be the leader and inspire the others as well. And this never happened.

    Some decent ranji levels guys will do man. I loved their attitiude though, inlike RCB or KKR. All the best to them

  • scorpicity says:

    AV… you are right… there was a significant exodus of their local talent into the ICL… ironically, those local players didn’t do all that well in the ICL too as expected.

    RP singh and great performances in the IPL… that’s a good one… what a laugh… it should specifically have been how many matches did the DC lose due to his bad bowling at the top.

    Yup… their attitude was cool so was the management.

  • Leave a Reply:

    Name (required):
    Mail (will not be published) (required):
    Website:
    Comment (required):
    XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>